Features
'Die with dignity' in Coffs
Graeme Singleton 10th February 2010
Coffs Harbour Historic Cemetery.
IT is a great place to live and a great place to visit – but Coffs Harbour is also now a great place to die.
That’s according to one of Australia’s foremost authorities on ageing, Professor Colleen Cartwright.
“It’s probably not something you would want to put on tourist brochures but I find it very gratifying that Coffs Harbour really is one of the best places to end your life with dignity,” Prof Cartwright said.
“And that’s all due to the ageing culture we have developed here,” she said.
The internationally recognised academic is based at the local campus of Southern Cross University where she heads the Aged Services Learning and Research Centre.
While Prof Cartwright has long been involved in issues surrounding frail older people living in the community and in aged care, she said she has increasingly become engaged in the debate about dying. She particularly welcomed the intellectual and emotional stimulus provided by Monday night’s ABC 4 Corners program about palliative care.
“We need to have an open debate about dying, and about the dignity of dying,” Prof Cartwright said.
“And we need to distinguish between what is and isn’t euthanasia. People get confused but in my mind prolonging a life full of pain is little more than abuse. We need to understand that sometimes medical intervention merely prolongs death rather than prolongs life.”
In the 4 Corners program, the director of the Sacred Heart Palliative Care Unit in Sydney, Dr Richard Chye, argued that the medical community’s obsession with curing sickness is leaving some terminally ill patients poorly cared for and unprepared for death.
As well Prof Ken Hillman, from the University of NSW, said too many very ill patients end up in acute-care hospital wards when, in fact, they would be better off in other settings to die peacefully.
“We want to look after them. We want to cure them. And in doing so we’ve set up a situation where it’s difficult to die peacefully,” Prof Hillman said.
Prof Cartwright said giving people the option of dying ‘on their own terms’ was at the core of initiatives developed in Coffs Harbour over the past decade that had made the city a better place to pass over.
“In our residential aged care system people now don’t have to go to hospitals to die,” Prof Cartwright said. “They can be left to die in their familiar environment rather than in the acute care ward of a hospital. It is a much more dignified option.”
Prof Cartwright said the obsession of some doctors to unnecessarily prolong life inevitably left many carers angry and bitter.
“All they can do is interrupt the dying path. All they do is put obstacles in place but they can only delay not defy the process of dying. Stopping or removing futile treatments is not euthanasia. It is humane.”
Professor Cartwright said people needed to know that in Australia people have a legal right to refuse food and medication, and the ability to make out Advance Health Care Directives which detail their dying wishes.





















Recent comments on this article
This is such a never-ending debate that will really go nowhere and it seems these supposed scholars perhaps make a living by going around stirring up these issues. Yes I’m sure we all agree we’re going to die and how we die should be our choice.
But the problem is I don’t think any government in Australia will say okay here’s a suicide pill to make your final days quicker and less painless. And if it ever did the system would be open to massive abuse opening up legal nightmares.
Any form of medical intervention does in most cases prolong life that’s why millions of people take daily medication and get life saving treatment. If this would all stop tomorrow people would be dying just like they were hundred years ago. But we have supposedly advanced in society and technology.
Perhaps in another hundred years people may be kept alive another 50 years who knows? I suppose if people want to kill themselves it could be made easier but who decides when the person themselves cant anymore. A judge, a doctor, a relative and what if they’re wrong? Who will be the executioner?
Will it get to the stage when doctors say there’s no more room for anymore in this place some will have to go lets choose? This is already happening in our medical system.
Many doctors are already choosing not to prolong people’s lives as they have done for years and are still doing everyday. This is no secret. The hospital system can’t cope with patient quantities and nor can outside care options.
Many carers just simply can’t cope with the care of their family members and the government shouldn’t be placing carers in this position. When it gets to the stage when a carer can no longer cope its no wonder they want a quick way out. But that’s not to say that relative may not live for some years longer. Older people will always be a burden on others.
But I suppose we are still human beings to some and expecting relatives to cope with the aged and frail is definitely no answer at all. Proving a death pill to people to solve the doctors over stocking problem is a quick fix for them no doubt. Is it ethical? It was for Adolf Hitler.
Animals are put down everyday and I expect this may end up being the future for some of us.